Judge Ellen Ceisler instructed the jury of its duties this afternoon in deliberating the guilt of two men accused of sexually abusing a minor in two separate incidents in the winter of 1999 and the spring of 2000. Judge Ceisler informed the jury of the charges against Father Charles Engelhardt and Bernard Shero and of the conditions under which the jury might find the men guilty – particulars of law relating to 7 offenses. One, a charge of Aggravated Indecent Assault levied against Bernard Shero, was read mistakenly, as Shero does not stand accused of this offense (upon arraignment, a court official also incorrectly asked for pleas from both defendants to charges which they did not face). After the instructions, all parties left courthouse as the jury is expected to deliberate into next week.
Engelhardt and Shero are both charged with Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse, Indecent Assault of a Child, Corruption of a Minor, and Endangering the Welfare of a Child. Shero is additionally charged with Rape/Attempted Rape, and Engelhardt faces 3 counts of Conspiracy – Conspiracy to commit Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse, Conspiracy to Endanger the Welfare of a Child, and Conspiracy to Corrupt a Minor.
Judge Ceisler instructed the jury that in order to find Father Engelhardt guilty of the charges of conspiracy they must find that he conspired with convicted former priest Edward Avery to sexually abuse “Billy,” a fact which will require a large inference, as the only witness who could provide evidence to its occurrence, Edward Avery, testified adamantly to the contrary.
Avery, who pleaded guilty last year to abusing Engelhardt and Shero’s alleged victim, recanted his admission of guilt in that case and flatly denied that he had ever discussed the victim with Father Engelhardt at all.
There is one comment
[…] by the Declaration was the sex abuse trial of Father Charles Engelhardt and teacher Bernard Shero, convicted in January of 2013 largely by the testimony of one “Billy Doe,” the Commonwealth’s […]