Venue Heavily Questioned by Court and Defense, Broad View of CFAA Encouraged by Government in Auernheimer Appeal

The Federal Building housing the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals

The Federal Building housing the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals

by Kenneth Lipp and Dustin Slaughter

A three judge panel of the 3rd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Philadelphia heard oral arguments this morning in the case of US v Andrew Auernheimer. The gallery of the 19th floor Albert Branson Maris Courtroom filled to capacity by 9:45 a.m., with spectators including US attorneys unattached to the case, journalists, supporters, local and visiting private attorneys, and computer professionals and developers talking shop. The court heard 15 minutes of argument from both Orin Kerr for the defense and Glenn Moramarco for the government, who answered questions from the panel throughout which reflected a genuine interest from the judges in clarifying still vague elements of computer law under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, upon which Auernheimer’s conviction hinge. The questioning from the court of both sides focused largely on the issue of venue, specifically the use of New Jersey statutes to assign venue and to enhance a criminal charge under federal law.

Congress did not make it illegal to violate New Jersey law….the question is what Congress did, not the New Jersey Legislature,” said defense attorney Kerr, arguing that the location for Auernheimer, known as Weev’s, trial was improper, and that the application of state laws to enhance the severity of charges resulted in a prejudicial adjudication of his client’s case.

The attorney for the government, Glenn, argued that New Jersey was an appropriate venue, as “the internet is accessible in all 50 states,” and thus when information which Weev and his partner sent to Gawker was published by the site it opened jurisdiction for prosecution to the entirety of the United States. Moramarco acknowledged upon questioning by Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr. that none of the 4500 New Jersey residents whose emails were exposed by AT&T’s website had that information posted in the Gawker article.

I encourage the court not to take a narrow view on computer law,” Moramarco told the panel.

Arguments concluded with a short rebuttal from Kerr and an assurance from the presiding judge that both sides’ arguments would be earnestly considered. Mr. Kerr told The Declaration outside the courtroom that he was “cautiously optimistic” about the outcome of the proceedings.

Attorney Tor Ekeland, another member of the defense team, also stressed the importance of the government’s position on venue, saying that “what they’re arguing essentially strips the Constitution of all venue clauses. It’s insane.”


Editor’s note: Upon publication this article referred to Tor Ekeland
of Tor Ekeland, PC, attorney, as a ” member of the defense team.” Mr. Ekeland was Auernheimer’s counsel at trial and continues to represent him.

Advertisements

About Kenneth Lipp

Kenneth is a writer and researcher. He’s from Alabama, and will not apologize for it. He moved to Pennsylvania in 2012, but has been in love with Philadelphia since a late-night stroll down Ben Franklin Parkway to the Art Museum in July of 2011 with the love of his life. He is interested in telling Philadelphia’s dynamic and absolutely unique stories with the zeal of a constantly enamored newcomer. Kenneth is also passionate about government transparency and protection of whistleblowers, most notably PFC Chelsea Manning. His research and reporting on law enforcement and surveillance have been featured in various publications, including Rolling Stone (Meet the Private Companies Helping Cops Spy on Protesters) and Popular Science (Boston Tested Crowd-Watching Software That Catalogues People's Skin Color). His training is in both genetics and history and he likes the joke about being a helicase and unzipping your “genes.” He’s driven to know, and thinks you can handle, the truth. Follow him on Twitter @kennethlipp.

There are 4 comments

  1. pdgpa

    The government lawyer’s name is Glenn Moramarco, not “Albert Glenn.” He is an assistant U.S. attorney in the appellate section of the U.S Attorney’s office for the federal district of New Jersey. He is not the “head of the computer crimes unit.” Not sure where you got that. The judges assigned to decide the case, in addition to Joseph Greenaway, are Michael Chagares and Thomas Vanaskie.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s